On the other hand, it is in danger of becoming slightly bloated with features, and unless you're an Outlook power user, you're unlikely to use most of them. Although it packs more bells and whistles into its interface than Gmail's streamlined offering, Microsoft manages to stop its inbox becoming too cluttered and oppressive. The list of emails is compact and efficient without being too squashed together, and there's a raft of customisation options you can use to tweak the layout if you're not quite happy. Google has perfected its minimalist design, and the Gmail inbox is simple, clear, and easy to navigate. Gmail is possibly the best example of this. If you're going to be dealing with your emails on a regular basis, you'll want to make sure that the interface isn't going to give you a headache. The most important part of any email client is its interface. We put the three email clients head to head, to see which one is best suited to the modern workplace. But which email client should you use?įor years, Microsoft's Outlook was king of the business mail clients, but Gmail has now become a genuine contender in corporate as well as commercial settings, and Thunderbird remains one of the best-known open source offerings for those on a tighter budget.
Despite repeated reports that instant messaging tools like Slack and WhatsApp are soon to replace email, virtually all global business relies on email to some extent.
